Opinion
No. 362 WAL 2019 No. 363 WAL 2019 No. 364 WAL 2019 No. 365 WAL 2019
12-09-2019
IN RE: ADOPTION OF K.M.G. Petition of: T.L.G., Mother In re: Adoption of: A.M.G. Petition of: T.L.G., Mother In re: Adoption of S.A.G. Petition of: T.L.G., Mother In re: Adoption of J.C.C. Petition of: T.L.G., Mother
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Did the Superior Court commit an error of law by concluding that it has no authority to review, sua sponte, whether a child's legal interest was represented by counsel during an involuntary termination of parental rights hearing, as required by Section 2313(a) of the Adoption Act and this Court's decision in In re Adoption of L.B.M.?