From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooks v. Rich

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Mar 7, 2006
No. CV 605-065 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 7, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 605-065.

March 7, 2006


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (doc. nos. 4 10) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hooks v. Rich

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Mar 7, 2006
No. CV 605-065 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Hooks v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:RANDY HOOKS, Plaintiff, v. GLENN RICH, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

No. CV 605-065 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Smokes

Nevertheless, the purpose of Section 1997e(a) is not that "fact-intensive litigation" result over whether…

Walker v. Smokes

Nevertheless, the purpose of Section 1997e(a) is not that "fact-intensive litigation" result over whether…