From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holster v. Gatco Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 2008
SUMMARY ORDER No. 07-2191-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2008)

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER No. 07-2191-cv.

October 31, 2008.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff-Appellant's appeal is DENIED.

For Appellant: Todd C. Bank, Kew Gardens, N.Y.

For Appellee: Jeremy Gilman Gregory Lucht (Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan Aronoff LLP), Cleveland, OH; Joel Shafferman, New York, N.Y.

PRESENT: HON. GUIDO CALABRESI, HON. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judges, and HON. STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

The Honorable Stefan R. Underhill, of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.


Charles E. Holster III brought a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Bianco, J.) alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C § 227(b)(1)(C). Federal jurisdiction was grounded on diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). The District Court dismissed the complaint. See Holster v. Gatco, Inc., 485 F. Supp. 2d 179, 180 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). We affirm. See Bonime v. Avaya, Inc., 07-1136-cv, ___ F. 3d ___ (2d Cir. 2008). The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Holster v. Gatco Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 2008
SUMMARY ORDER No. 07-2191-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Holster v. Gatco Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Charles E. Holster III, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 2008

Citations

SUMMARY ORDER No. 07-2191-cv (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Holster v. Gatco, Inc.

We affirmed in a summary order predicated on a case decided the same day, raising the same issue, Bonime v.…