From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Anderson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 5, 2008
Civil No. 06-4497 (PJS/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-4497 (PJS/JJG).

February 5, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the undersigned upon the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to that report and recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and being duly advised of all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The defendants' motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED.
2. Hill's motion to amend his complaint (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED AS MOOT.
3. All claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. This litigation be closed and judgment entered.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Hill v. Anderson

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 5, 2008
Civil No. 06-4497 (PJS/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Hill v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:Tyrone B. Hill, Plaintiff, v. Marty C. Anderson, Orlando Maldonado, Tammy…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 06-4497 (PJS/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wattleton v. Hodge

(quoting Hill, 2008 WL 549928 at *2)); Cooke v. Stanton, No. 08-cv-1175 (MJD/JJK), 2009 WL 424537, at *4 &…

Fleming v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

Hence state defendants are often named to § 1983 litigation in both their individual and official capacities.…