From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. City of Kent

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 2, 2022
199 Wash. 2d 1003 (Wash. 2022)

Summary

viewing two constitutional provisions as coextensive in absence of Gunwall analysis

Summary of this case from State v. Ramos

Opinion

No. 100392-7

03-02-2022

Adrian Jacobo HERNANDEZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF KENT, Petitioner.



ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Johnson, Owens, Gordon McCloud, and Montoya-Lewis, considered at its March 1, 2022, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ González, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. City of Kent

Supreme Court of Washington.
Mar 2, 2022
199 Wash. 2d 1003 (Wash. 2022)

viewing two constitutional provisions as coextensive in absence of Gunwall analysis

Summary of this case from State v. Ramos
Case details for

Hernandez v. City of Kent

Case Details

Full title:Adrian Jacobo HERNANDEZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF KENT, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

199 Wash. 2d 1003 (Wash. 2022)
504 P.3d 828

Citing Cases

State v. Ramos

The court in Long stated that "[a]bsent support for an independent analysis, we view article I, section 14…