From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helbig v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Aug 22, 2019
4:18cv449-WS/MJF (N.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2019)

Opinion

4:18cv449-WS/MJF

08-22-2019

SUZANNE D. HELBIG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) docketed July 31, 2019. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed because, given the petitioner's claims, the court lacks the authority to grant the relief requested. As the magistrate judge aptly notes, section 2241 does not authorize the court to reduce the petitioner's sentence based upon her claim that prison officials violated her rights under the Eighth Amendment.

The petitioner has filed objections (ECF No. 12) to the report and recommendation. The undersigned has considered those objections but finds that they lack merit. Because the undersigned finds that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition is due to be dismissed for the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order of the court.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1) is DISMISSED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed."

4. The clerk shall close the case.

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2019.

s/ William Stafford

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Helbig v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Aug 22, 2019
4:18cv449-WS/MJF (N.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Helbig v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE D. HELBIG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

4:18cv449-WS/MJF (N.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2019)

Citing Cases

Gibson v. Pistro

In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted…

Gayle v. Meade

There are even more-recent cases which continue to use the Gomez rule. See e.g., Helbig v. United States, No.…