From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healy v. Healy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1901
59 N.E. 1119 (N.Y. 1901)

Summary

In Healy v. Healy (166 N.Y. 624) this court was confronted by a unanimous decision in the Appellate Division which prohibited it from considering questions which in this case are open to us.

Summary of this case from Holt v. Tuite

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1901

Decided April 16, 1901

Fletcher C. Peck and James H. Stevens for appellants.

Thomas Raines and Charles F. Miller for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Winne v. Winne ( 166 N.Y. 263).

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN and LANDON, JJ.


Summaries of

Healy v. Healy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1901
59 N.E. 1119 (N.Y. 1901)

In Healy v. Healy (166 N.Y. 624) this court was confronted by a unanimous decision in the Appellate Division which prohibited it from considering questions which in this case are open to us.

Summary of this case from Holt v. Tuite
Case details for

Healy v. Healy

Case Details

Full title:NEVA C. HEALY, Respondent, v . DORUS HEALY, as Administrator of JOSHUA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 16, 1901

Citations

59 N.E. 1119 (N.Y. 1901)
59 N.E. 1119

Citing Cases

Brantingham v. Huff

We have thus analyzed the testimony of the plaintiff's mother and called attention to the contract for the…

Weinberger v. Van Hessen

Their continued performance may be made a condition of the decree, if a decree be entered. ( Epstein v.…