finding that there was “no correlation between the ordinances and crime prevention and that the time restrictions on canvassing do not deter or prevent crime”
Summary of this case from Ohio Citizen Action v. City of EnglewoodNo. 86-982.
February 23, 1987.
C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 797 F. 2d 297.
finding that there was “no correlation between the ordinances and crime prevention and that the time restrictions on canvassing do not deter or prevent crime”
Summary of this case from Ohio Citizen Action v. City of EnglewoodFull title:HANTON v. KENNEDY ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 23, 1987
See, e.g., Fisichelli v. City Known as Town of Methuen, 884 F.2d 17, 18 (1st Cir. 1989) (defendants waive…
Curley v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Although § 1964(c) does not expressly limit the plaintiff's remedies, that Congress made an express provision…