From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hannon v. Siegel-Cooper Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1900
58 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1900)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1900

Decided October 9, 1900

Abraham Levy for motion.

George Putzel opposed.


The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Hannon v. Siegel-Cooper Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1900
58 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1900)
Case details for

Hannon v. Siegel-Cooper Company

Case Details

Full title:MARY F. HANNON, Respondent, v . SIEGEL-COOPER COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 9, 1900

Citations

58 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1900)
58 N.E. 1092

Citing Cases

Carlisle v. Barnes

The rights of an unsuccessful appellant are sufficiently protected by the double privilege given him, first,…