holding that claims of unauthorized broadcasts of cable television transmissions may be brought under both 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605
Summary of this case from J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Quesada Invs. LLCNo. 96-230.
October 15, 1996.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 81 F. 3d 451.
holding that claims of unauthorized broadcasts of cable television transmissions may be brought under both 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605
Summary of this case from J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Quesada Invs. LLCholding that an individual's use of a pirate cable television descrambling device to intercept without authorization programming services transmitted via satellite constituted a violation of § 605
Summary of this case from Directv, Inc. v. Montesholding that an individual's use of a "pirate" cable television descrambling device to intercept without authorization programming services transmitted via satellite constituted a violation of § 605
Summary of this case from Directv, Inc. v. Getchelnoting that if the signal that was intercepted was not radio-originated, then section 605 does not apply
Summary of this case from Entertainment by JJ, Inc. v. RamsarranFull title:HANCOCK ELECTRONICS CORP. v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 15, 1996
Trimen Dev. Co. v. King County, 124 Wash.2d 261, 877 P.2d 187, 189-190 (1994) (county's park development fees…
TOP RANK v. ESTATE OF GUTIERREZThe New York District Court had previously granted a summary judgment in favor of International Cablevision…