From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G.S. DONALDSON INV. CO. v. SHAY

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 16, 1927
86 Cal.App. 763 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)

Opinion

Docket No. 5728.

November 16, 1927.

MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Benjamin F. Warmer, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Arthur Wm. Green and G.H. Scharnikow for Appellant.

Duckworth Harrison and Le Roy B. Lorenz for Respondents.


This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was filed too late. It is submitted to us upon the motion and brief of respondent only, the appellant having failed to file any reply.

[1] From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment appealed from was entered on July 15, 1926, and that the notice of appeal was filed on April 9, 1927, and more than sixty days after the entry of judgment. No proceedings for a new trial were begun. Section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "An appeal may be taken from any judgment . . . within sixty days from the entry of said judgment." It has been uniformly held that the appeal must be taken within the time prescribed by law, otherwise the appellate court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. ( Lancel v. Postlethwaite, 172 Cal. 326 [ 156 P. 486].)

Appeal dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.


Summaries of

G.S. DONALDSON INV. CO. v. SHAY

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Nov 16, 1927
86 Cal.App. 763 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Case details for

G.S. DONALDSON INV. CO. v. SHAY

Case Details

Full title:G.S. DONALDSON INVESTMENT CO. (a Corporation), Appellant, v. W.A. SHAY et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Nov 16, 1927

Citations

86 Cal.App. 763 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
261 P. 499

Citing Cases

Bley v. Board of Dental Examiners of State of California

If the appeal is not taken within the time allowed by law, the appellate court has no power to entertain it.…