From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 1, 2015
CASE NO.: SC15-1929 (Fla. Dec. 1, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC15-1929

12-01-2015

GRETNA RACING, LLC Petitioner(s) v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ETC. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 1D14-3484; 2013050343

The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case.

Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before December 21, 2015; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits.

The Clerk of the First District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before February 1, 2016. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic. LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument. A True Copy
Test: /s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court kj Served: MARC WESLEY DUNBAR
DAVID S. ROMANIK
JONATHAN A. GLOGAU
ALLEN C. WINSOR
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK
LEON M. BIEGALSKI
DAVID WEISS


Summaries of

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 1, 2015
CASE NO.: SC15-1929 (Fla. Dec. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Gretna Racing, LLC v. Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation

Case Details

Full title:GRETNA RACING, LLC Petitioner(s) v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

CASE NO.: SC15-1929 (Fla. Dec. 1, 2015)

Citing Cases

Laycock v. TMS Logistics, Inc.

But these cases did not address—or even mention—the irreparable-harm component, and we cannot view these as…

Charles v. State

In determining the appropriate standard a successor judge is to apply when passing on a motion for rehearing,…