From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenwood v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 24, 1915
174 S.W. 1049 (Tex. Crim. App. 1915)

Summary

holding theft of automobile, as a misdemeanor, was not triable in district court

Summary of this case from Barfield v. State

Opinion

No. 3483.

Decided March 24, 1915.

Theft of Automobile — Misdemeanor.

Under the recent Act of the Legislature, the theft of an automobile is a misdemeanor, and can not be tried in the District Court. Following Sparks v. State, recently decided.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before the Hon. Robt. B. Seay.

Appeal from a conviction of theft of an automobile; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

Newton P. Morrison and W.F. Bane, for appellant.

C.C. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of theft of an automobile, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Under the Act of the Legislature the theft of an automobile is a misdemeanor and not triable in the District Court. Under the recent case of Sparks v. State, this case will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Greenwood v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 24, 1915
174 S.W. 1049 (Tex. Crim. App. 1915)

holding theft of automobile, as a misdemeanor, was not triable in district court

Summary of this case from Barfield v. State
Case details for

Greenwood v. the State

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN GREENWOOD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 24, 1915

Citations

174 S.W. 1049 (Tex. Crim. App. 1915)
76 Tex. Crim. 364

Citing Cases

Barfield v. State

Moreover, if, as the dissent suggests, the two prior DWI convictions are merely for punishment enhancement,…