From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. United Lift Service Company, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-826 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2010)

Summary

finding that the defendant was liable for breaching an implied contract to "competently service chair lift"

Summary of this case from First Nonprofit Ins. Co. v. Meenan Oil LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-826.

October 25, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2010, following an assessment of damages hearing on March 31, 2010, a default having been entered on March 4, 2010, in consideration of the attached Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, IT IS ORDERED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in FAVOR of plaintiffs, Larry Goldstein and Melissa Goldstein, and AGAINST defendant, United Lift Service Company, Inc., in the total amount of $40,299, plus interest on $15,299 at the lawful rate from October 24, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served by the Deputy Clerk on counsel for plaintiffs and on defendant, United Lift Service Company, Inc., at 2412 Egg Harbor Road, Lindenwold, New Jersey 08021-1431.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. United Lift Service Company, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-826 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2010)

finding that the defendant was liable for breaching an implied contract to "competently service chair lift"

Summary of this case from First Nonprofit Ins. Co. v. Meenan Oil LLC

recognizing implied duty to perform work with ordinary skill and care under chairlift maintenance contract

Summary of this case from Del., Lackawaxen & Stourbridge R.R. Co. v. Star Trak, Inc.

recognizing implied duty to perform work with ordinary skill and care under chairlift maintenance contract

Summary of this case from Del., Lackawaxen & Stourbridge R.R. Co. v. Star Trak, Inc.
Case details for

Goldstein v. United Lift Service Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LARRY GOLDSTEIN; MELISSA GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiffs v. UNITED LIFT SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-826 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Rieger v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am.

The Court holds that the implied-warranty claims of Garden, Gonzalez, Hensley, and Lowegard must fail as they…

Md. Cas. Co. v. Preferred Fire Prot., Inc.

Under Pennsylvania law, "[o]ne who undertakes any work impliedly assumes that he will do it with ordinary…