Summary
In Glushing v. Sharp, supra, the Court said: "The open gate was a substantial assurance of safety, just as significant as if the gateman had beckoned or invited him to come on, and that an ordinarily prudent man would not be influenced by it, is against all human experience."
Summary of this case from Balto. Ohio R. Co. v. StumpfOpinion
Submitted June 25, 1884
Decided October 7, 1884
Edward E. Sprague for appellant.
Oliver S. Ackley for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.