From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillespie v. Wright

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1990
802 P.2d 1303 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

stating the objection that an instruction should be in writing should be timely and specific

Summary of this case from Nash v. Plaza Electric, Inc.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

CV891045; CA A63696

Submitted on record and briefs November 26, 1990.

Reversed and remanded December 26, 1990

Appeal from Circuit Court, Umatilla County, R.B. Abrams, Judge.

Wade P. Bettis, Jr., and Bettis Ricker, P.C., La Grande, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. Bird v. Maass (A64583), 104 Or. App. 271, 800 P.2d 792 (1990).

Summaries of

Gillespie v. Wright

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1990
802 P.2d 1303 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

stating the objection that an instruction should be in writing should be timely and specific

Summary of this case from Nash v. Plaza Electric, Inc.
Case details for

Gillespie v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:Monte A. GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. R.L. WRIGHT, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 26, 1990

Citations

802 P.2d 1303 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
802 P.2d 1303

Citing Cases

Schroeder v. Rawlings

Olian v. Olian, 59 S.W.2d 673, 332 Mo. 689; Whitman v. Carver, 88 S.W.2d 885, 337 Mo. 1247; Buehler v. Festus…

Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp. v. Galek

True, the prayer for relief asks, not only for an injunction, but that the "lease be specifically performed."…

10 Citing Cases