holding that defendants could be liable for negligent misrepresentation if they falsely stated that no further approvals were required for contemplated transactions
Summary of this case from Kirtz v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.No. 03-P-1139.
April 8, 2005.
Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment on third party complaint reversed. Further proceedings shall conform to the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court.
holding that defendants could be liable for negligent misrepresentation if they falsely stated that no further approvals were required for contemplated transactions
Summary of this case from Kirtz v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.Full title:FIRST MASSACHUSETTS BANK, N.A. vs. U. FRANCIS FLORIAN others
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Apr 8, 2005
See id. ¶ 109. Accordingly, she has stated a claim for negligent misrepresentation. Cf. First Mass. Bank,…