From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ervin v. Kansas St. Bd. of Tech. Professions

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jun 24, 2005
113 P.3d 834 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

In Ervin, the nonfinal order was the Kansas State Board of Technical Professions' denial of a motion to dismiss a second complaint against Ervin that had been submitted to the Board; Ervin had argued for dismissal based on grounds of res judicata and claim preclusion stemming from the disposition of a previous complaint.

Summary of this case from Steinmetz v. United Parcel Serv. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 92,821.

June 24, 2005.

Appeal from Shawnee.


Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ervin v. Kansas St. Bd. of Tech. Professions

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jun 24, 2005
113 P.3d 834 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)

In Ervin, the nonfinal order was the Kansas State Board of Technical Professions' denial of a motion to dismiss a second complaint against Ervin that had been submitted to the Board; Ervin had argued for dismissal based on grounds of res judicata and claim preclusion stemming from the disposition of a previous complaint.

Summary of this case from Steinmetz v. United Parcel Serv. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Ervin v. Kansas St. Bd. of Tech. Professions

Case Details

Full title:ERVIN v. KANSAS STATE BD. OF TECHNICAL PROFESSIONS

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas

Date published: Jun 24, 2005

Citations

113 P.3d 834 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Steinmetz v. United Parcel Serv. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

UPS argues that it meets the second prong because the “Board's order to remand the case is an inadequate…