From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echevarria v. Waters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2004-01229.

Decided June 7, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant James F. Waters appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 12, 2004, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the action as against him, in effect, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27.

Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellant.

Sonin Genis, Bronx, N.Y. (Robert J. Genis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, TEPHEN G. CRANE, ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the action as against the appellant is denied, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The action was dismissed when the plaintiff's counsel failed to appear at a final pretrial conference. To be relieved of the default in appearing at the conference, the plaintiff was required to show both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; 22 NYCRR 202.27; Kandel v. Hoffman, 309 A.D.2d 904, 905; Precision Envelope Co. v. Marcus Co., 306 A.D.2d 263, 264; cf. Reices v. Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn Queens, 306 A.D.2d 394). The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she had a meritorious cause of action against the appellant, as there was no evidence that the appellant was negligent in the occurrence of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142[a]; Ali v. Tip Top Tows, 304 A.D.2d 683; Zelaya v. Cappadona, 294 A.D.2d 431; Gravina v. Wakschal, 255 A.D.2d 291). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion to vacate the dismissal of the action as against the appellant should have been denied.

SANTUCCI, J.P., H. MILLER, LUCIANO, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Echevarria v. Waters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Echevarria v. Waters

Case Details

Full title:CECILIA ECHEVARRIA, respondent, v. JAMES F. WATERS, appellant, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 724

Citing Cases

Watson v. New York City

We affirm. To vacate the default, the plaintiffs were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the…

Tyberg v. Neustein

The action was dismissed when the plaintiffs' counsel failed to appear on the date set for trial ( see 22…