From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Precision Envelope Co., v. Marcus Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06711

Submitted May 14, 2003.

June 2, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for accounting malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated June 18, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 to dismiss the complaint.

Kenneth Henrie, Massapequa, N.Y., for appellant.

Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, Matthew S. Lerner, and Peter R. Chatzinoff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the plaintiff failed to appear at a status conference. To avoid dismissal pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 for failing to appear at the conference, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for failing to appear at the conference, and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 A.D.2d 190, 197). The plaintiff failed to demonstrate either. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Precision Envelope Co., v. Marcus Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2003
306 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Precision Envelope Co., v. Marcus Company

Case Details

Full title:PRECISION ENVELOPE CO., INC., appellant, v. MARCUS COMPANY LLC, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Franchise Acquisitions v. Jefferson Valley

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. To avoid dismissal of the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR…

William Wild v. Target Corp.

The action was dismissed when the plaintiffs failed to appear at a duly scheduled status conference. To…