From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. City of Duncan

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2012-213499 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-213499 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-400

11-12-2014

John Doe, Appellant, v. City of Duncan, Respondent.

Gregg E. Meyers, of Jeff Anderson & Associates, of St. Paul, Minnesota, for Appellant. William Harrell Foster, III, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, and Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, both of Greenville; and Allen Mattison Bogan and Miles Edward Coleman, both of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Gregg E. Meyers, of Jeff Anderson & Associates, of St. Paul, Minnesota, for Appellant. William Harrell Foster, III, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, and Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, both of Greenville; and Allen Mattison Bogan and Miles Edward Coleman, both of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: John Doe appeals the trial court's dismissal of his action pursuant to Rules 3, 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(2), SCRCP. Doe argues the trial court improperly dismissed his action because it did not apply the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 422, 526 S.E.2d 716, 724 (2000) (holding if the losing party has raised an issue in the lower court, but the court fails to rule upon it, the party must file a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to alter or amend the judgment in order to preserve the issue for appellate review). AFFIRMED.

50 App. U.S.C.A. §§ 501-515 and 516-597b (Supp. 2014).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
--------

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Doe v. City of Duncan

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2012-213499 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Doe v. City of Duncan

Case Details

Full title:John Doe, Appellant, v. City of Duncan, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2012-213499 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2014)

Citing Cases

Doe v. City of Duncan

Turner, Jr., of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of Greenville, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: Petitioner…

Doe v. City of Duncan

This court affirmed the circuit court in an unpublished opinion finding Doe's argument the circuit court…