From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1999
137 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 1999)

Summary

concluding that although the superior court in part usurped the Board's role of determining GMA compliance, the court nevertheless remanded the matter for further proceedings

Summary of this case from Whidbey Envtl. Action v. Island County

Opinion

1999.


Summaries of

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

The Supreme Court of Washington
Jan 1, 1999
137 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 1999)

concluding that although the superior court in part usurped the Board's role of determining GMA compliance, the court nevertheless remanded the matter for further proceedings

Summary of this case from Whidbey Envtl. Action v. Island County

concluding that although the superior court in part usurped the Board's role of determining GMA compliance, the court nevertheless remanded the matter for further proceedings

Summary of this case from Whidbey Environmental Action Network v. Island Cty
Case details for

Dispositions of Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Jan 1, 1999

Citations

137 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 1999)
137 Wn. 2d 1018

Citing Cases

Yakima County v. E. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings

Accordingly, the court should have remanded this matter to the Board, unless doing so is impracticable or…

Whidbey Envtl. Action v. Island County

We fail to see any prejudice to WEAN by the full scope of the court's action, particularly in view of our…