From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1996
76 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 1996)

Summary

pointing out that "[a]though an evidentiary hearing is not specifically required by Civ.R. 65, the language of the rule strongly suggests that an evidentiary hearing will be held prior to ruling on a preliminary injunction," and thus agreeing "with the decisions of these appellate courts that the trial court must first conduct an evidentiary hearing on a preliminary injunction motion"

Summary of this case from Executive Mgmt. Servs. Inc. v. Cincinnati State Technical & Cmty. College

Opinion

1996.


Summaries of

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1996
76 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 1996)

pointing out that "[a]though an evidentiary hearing is not specifically required by Civ.R. 65, the language of the rule strongly suggests that an evidentiary hearing will be held prior to ruling on a preliminary injunction," and thus agreeing "with the decisions of these appellate courts that the trial court must first conduct an evidentiary hearing on a preliminary injunction motion"

Summary of this case from Executive Mgmt. Servs. Inc. v. Cincinnati State Technical & Cmty. College
Case details for

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Case Details

Full title:DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 1, 1996

Citations

76 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 1996)

Citing Cases

Union Township v. Union Twn. Local 3412

In ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the trial court must consider "whether (1) the movant has…

State v. Ghaster

`A complaint is legally sufficient when it states all of the essential elements of the offense, such that the…