From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Bd. of Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Miyao

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Feb 23, 2021
SCAD-19-0000144 (Haw. Feb. 23, 2021)

Opinion

SCAD-19-0000144

02-23-2021

DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI'I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner, v. RICHARD T. MIYAO, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(ODC NO. 17-O-059) ORDER
()

Upon consideration of the February 16, 2021 motion, filed by Bradley Tamm, as Trustee Administrator at the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), for permission from this court to apply the provisions of Rule 2.20(h)(7) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH) (2021) to the remaining, unclaimed client files from the law practice of attorney Richard T. Miyao, and upon a review of the record in this matter, we conclude that, in light of the successful efforts undertaken to notify former clients of the existence of client files and of the necessity of retrieving those files, no further purpose would be served by retaining the remaining, unclaimed files pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.20(d)(1984). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Trustee Administrator Tamm may apply the provisions of RSCH Rule 2.20(h) (2021) as appropriate to ensure the proper retention of legally operative original documents and other items of value from the files, and the secure destruction of the remaining materials.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 23, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth


Summaries of

Disciplinary Bd. of Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Miyao

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Feb 23, 2021
SCAD-19-0000144 (Haw. Feb. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Disciplinary Bd. of Hawai'i Supreme Court v. Miyao

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI'I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner, v. RICHARD T…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Feb 23, 2021

Citations

SCAD-19-0000144 (Haw. Feb. 23, 2021)