Opinion
June, 1923.
Order modified by striking out the provision for the renewal of the motion at a future time, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dexter Sulphite Pulp and Paper Company v. Hearst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Summaries of
Dexter Sulphite Pulp and Paper Company v. Hearst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1923
206 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for
Dexter Sulphite Pulp and Paper Company v. Hearst
Case Details
Full title:DEXTER SULPHITE PULP AND PAPER COMPANY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM RANDOLPH…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1923
Citations
206 App. Div. 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Citing Cases
Dexter Sulphite Pulp Paper Co. v. Hearst. No. 1
A demurrer was interposed by the defendant Hearst on several grounds, one being that there was a defect of…