From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 5, 1984
325 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68880.

DECIDED DECEMBER 5, 1984.

Non-payment of agricultural products. Bulloch Superior Court. Before Judge Hawkins.

William W. Larsen, Jr., for appellants.

J. Lane Johnston, District Attorney, M. Allen Price, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The appellants, Marvin Davis, Mike Paulk, and Bobby Fortner, appeal their convictions of failure to pay for agricultural products in violation of former Code Ann. § 5-9914. The alleged criminal conduct occurred on July 30, 1981. On November 1, 1982, the effective date of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, former Code Ann. § 5-9914 was repealed. See OCGA § 1-1-10 (a) (1). Originally, no similar offense appeared in the new code; however, at the following session of the Legislature, the language of the former code section was re-enacted verbatim as OCGA § 16-9-58 (Ga. L. 1983, p. 485, § 2). The appellants contend that any criminal misconduct of which they may have been guilty under the former statute was pardoned by the Legislature's action in repealing the statute without an express saving provision applicable to such prior misconduct. Held:

This issue is controlled favorably to the appellants by this Court's recent decision in State v. Fordham, 172 Ga. App. 853 ( 324 S.E.2d 796) (1984). The convictions are consequently reversed, rendering the remaining enumerations of error moot.

Judgment reversed. Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.


DECIDED DECEMBER 5, 1984.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 5, 1984
325 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS et al. v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 5, 1984

Citations

325 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
325 S.E.2d 926

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

]" Bradley v. United States, 410 U.S. 605, 607-608 ( 93 S.C. 1151, 35 L.Ed.2d 528) (1973). In Gunn v. State,…

Engel v. Bourbeau

Another recognized exception to this general rule, along with a saving clause, is where the legislature…