From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daugherty v. Daugherty

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Nov 25, 1980
609 S.W.2d 127 (Ky. 1980)

Summary

noting the statutory presumption in KRS 304.39-020 that any medical bill submitted is reasonable

Summary of this case from Osborne v. Pinsonneault

Opinion

November 25, 1980.

Appeal from the Fleming Circuit Court.

F. L. Pearl, Louisville, Quinn F. Pearl, Jr., Radcliffe, for movant.

Woodson T. Wood, Maysville, for respondent.


Movant, Susan Lind Daugherty, appeals from the judgment of the Fleming Circuit Court based on a jury verdict awarding her $2,065.40 for medical expenses and $350 for pain and suffering. The Court of Appeals affirmed this judgment and we granted discretionary review.

On the afternoon of March 24, 1976, Susan Lind was a passenger in a pickup truck driven by respondent, Loring Daugherty, who had become her husband at the time of the trial. Their vehicle collided head-on with another pickup truck driven by Larry Risner. Susan sustained serious injuries over her entire body and was rushed to the Fleming County Hospital. From there she was taken to Ireland Army Hospital at Fort Knox where she remained a little over six weeks. She received the treatment at Ireland as a dependent of her father who was serving in the military at the time.

Movant brought this negligence action, naming both Daugherty and Risner as defendants. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of Risner and the jury subsequently awarded Susan damages in the amount of $2,065.40 for medical expenses incurred at the Fleming County Hospital and $350 for pain and suffering. At trial she attempted to prove an additional $7,578 in medical bills she incurred at Ireland Army Hospital. The trial court disallowed the introduction of this evidence. In so doing the trial judge reasoned that (1) movant was not obligated to repay the federal government, and (2) she failed to prove that the medical charges were reasonable.

In Our Lady of Mercy Hospital v. McIntosh, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 377 (1970), this court allowed an injured plaintiff to recover all medical expenses incurred even though a substantial portion of the bill was paid by Medicare. We stated that the payments a person makes to Medicare are like premiums paid for medical insurance and allowed full recovery.

In Conley v. Foster, Ky., 335 S.W.2d 904 (1960), this court allowed full recovery for medical expenses even though part of the bill had been paid by a United Mine Workers of America welfare fund.

The case at bar is similar to those involving Medicare and welfare funds. Although movant's father was not required to pay premiums in order to qualify for medical treatment at a military hospital, the coverage was nonetheless a direct benefit of his military service. As a dependent, movant also shared the benefits of this coverage.

On the question of reasonableness, we feel that the medical bill alone was sufficient in light of the statutory presumption that any medical bill submitted is reasonable. KRS 304.39-020(5)(a).

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Fleming Circuit Court for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

All concur.


Summaries of

Daugherty v. Daugherty

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Nov 25, 1980
609 S.W.2d 127 (Ky. 1980)

noting the statutory presumption in KRS 304.39-020 that any medical bill submitted is reasonable

Summary of this case from Osborne v. Pinsonneault

noting the statutory presumption in KRS 304.39-020 that any medical bill submitted is reasonable

Summary of this case from Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Samples

In Daugherty v. Daugherty, 609 S.W.2d 127, 128 (Ky. 1980), we held that medical bills incurred by the plaintiff for treatment at a military hospital were both provable and collectable, even though not payable by her because of her father's status as a military servicemember.

Summary of this case from Baptist Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. Miller

noting the statutory presumption in KRS 304.39-020 that any medical bill submitted is reasonable

Summary of this case from State Farm Ins. Co. v. Morris
Case details for

Daugherty v. Daugherty

Case Details

Full title:Susan Lind DAUGHERTY, Movant, v. Loring B. DAUGHERTY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Kentucky

Date published: Nov 25, 1980

Citations

609 S.W.2d 127 (Ky. 1980)

Citing Cases

State Farm Ins. Co. v. Morris

[W]e have long held that evidence such as that presented in this case is sufficient to establish that the…

Osborne v. Pinsonneault

The Kentucky Supreme Court has recognized that an automobile accident victim's medical bills are admissible…