categorizing as an “abuse” of the class action system the practice of state courts “making judgments that impose their view of the law on other States and bind the rights of the residents of those States”
Summary of this case from Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co.No. 1092 MDA 2004.
January 27, 2005.
Appeal from the 4294 CA 2003 (York).
Affirmed.
categorizing as an “abuse” of the class action system the practice of state courts “making judgments that impose their view of the law on other States and bind the rights of the residents of those States”
Summary of this case from Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co.setting effective date for CAFA amendments as the date of enactment, 18 February 2005
Summary of this case from Tmesys, Inc. v. Eufaula Drugs, Inc.amending 28 U.S.C. § 1332 by inserting (d)
Summary of this case from Class Action Fairness Act and the Federalization of Class ActionsFull title:COM. v. GAVILAN-CRUZ
Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 27, 2005
This motion concerns the enforceability of the parties' agreement to arbitrate their disputes before the NAF…
Delaventura v. Columbia Acorn TrustThe panel considers a large number of cases, including patent and antitrust cases, and claims against…