From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cochran v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 29, 1925
275 S.W. 810 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)

Opinion

Decided September 29, 1925.

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

F.W. STOWERS for appellant.

FRANK E. DAUGHERTY, Attorney General, and GARDNER K. BYERS, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Reversing.

The indictment in this case, charging appellant with wife desertion, is endorsed "a true bill," but this is not signed by the foreman of the grand jury, as is required by section 119 of the Criminal Code.

This provision is mandatory, and the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the indictment, as is conceded by the attorney general. Oliver v. Commonwealth, 95 Ky. 372, 25 S.W. 600; Commonwealth v. L. N. R. Co., 32 S.W. 136; Lewis v. Commonwealth, 48 S.W. 977; Terrell v. Commonwealth, 194 Ky. 608, 240 S.W. 81.

Wherefore, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.


Summaries of

Cochran v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Sep 29, 1925
275 S.W. 810 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)
Case details for

Cochran v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Cochran v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Sep 29, 1925

Citations

275 S.W. 810 (Ky. Ct. App. 1925)
275 S.W. 810

Citing Cases

Pruitt v. State

The indictment was not signed by the foreman of the grand jury in any manner or form and no attempt at…

Dunn v. Commonwealth

While in Patterson v. Commonwealth, 86 Ky. 313, 5 S.W. 765, 9 Ky. Law Rep. 481, and Pickerel v. Commonwealth,…