From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cline v. Wiedimen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 4, 2021
CASE NO.: 21cv-112 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2021)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 21cv-112

02-04-2021

Brad Cline, Plaintiff, v. Matthew Wiedimen, et al., Defendants.


MAGISTRATE VASCURA OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate on January 13, 2021. (ECF No. 3). The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court GRANTS Mr. Cline's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and DISMISSES the case under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Sarah D. Morrison

SARAH D. MORRISON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cline v. Wiedimen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 4, 2021
CASE NO.: 21cv-112 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Cline v. Wiedimen

Case Details

Full title:Brad Cline, Plaintiff, v. Matthew Wiedimen, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 4, 2021

Citations

CASE NO.: 21cv-112 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2021)

Citing Cases

Shine-Johnson v. DeWine

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that despite asserting claims against each Defendant in their…