Clay v. East Orange

Full title: ARTHUR L. CLAY, DAVID SCHULMAN (DAVAL ASSOCIATES) AND ALAN SCHULMAN…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 6, 1982

91 N.J. 429 (N.J. 1982)

452 A.2d 1323

Opinion

Argued November 22, 1982 —

Decided December 6, 1982.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

H. Neil Broder argued the cause for appellants ( Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein Hammer, attorneys; H. Neil Broder and Michael L. Ostrowsky, on the brief).

Ernest R. Booker, First Assistant City Counsel, argued the cause for respondents ( William H. Eaton, City Counsel, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, 181 N.J. Super. 40, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, which opinion is reported at 177 N.J. Super. 79 (Law Div. 1980).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 7.

For reversal — None.