From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. City of East Orange

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 9, 1981
181 N.J. Super. 40 (App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

Argued September 21, 1981 —

Decided October 9, 1981.

Before Judges ALLCORN, FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG.

On appeal from Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, whose opinion is reported at 177 N.J. Super. 79 (1980).

H. Neil Broder argued the cause for appellants ( Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein Hammer, attorneys).

Ernest R. Booker, First Assistant City Counsel, argued the cause for respondents ( William H. Eaton, City Counsel, attorney).


The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Hopkins which is reported at 177 N.J. Super. 79 (Law Div. 1980).


Summaries of

Clay v. City of East Orange

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 9, 1981
181 N.J. Super. 40 (App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Clay v. City of East Orange

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR L. CLAY, DAVID SCHULMAN (DAVAL ASSOCIATES) AND ALAN SCHULMAN…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 9, 1981

Citations

181 N.J. Super. 40 (App. Div. 1981)
436 A.2d 553

Citing Cases

Northwest Bergen v. Midland Park

See Jacobs v. Great Pacific Century Corp., 104 N.J. 580, 586-587, 518 A.2d 223 (1986); Karl's Sales Serv. v.…

M.P. v. Wee Care Day Nursery of Maplewood

Leitner v. Citizens Casaulty Co. of N.Y., 135 N.J.L. 608, 52 A.2d 687 (E. A. 1947). See also Clay v. East…