From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY v. DODD

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 10, 1933
131 Cal.App. 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 4854.

April 10, 1933.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the city clerk and ex-officio assessor of the City of Crescent City to assess certain real property. Alternative writ dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H.A. Postlethwaite for Petitioner.

G. Fletcher Dodd, in pro. per., for Respondent.


THE COURT.

Since the submission of this cause which was instituted for the purpose of determining the location of the boundary lines of the City of Crescent City, there has come to our attention the act of the legislature approved June 3, 1921 (Stats. 1921, p. 1607; Act 896, p. 414, Deering's Gen. Laws), providing a proceeding or method for determining the boundary lines of cities, towns and counties which may be indefinite or uncertain from any cause. This act furnishes a full and complete remedy to cities, and by its provisions allows a full and complete investigation as to indefinite or uncertain boundaries; allows the introduction of testimony and maps, and gives a direct method of determining the true boundaries of cities, towns and counties. [1] Under such circumstances, where a complete remedy is afforded, the court is of the opinion that a proceeding in mandamus should not be entertained where the boundary lines of cities are sought to be determined, when such boundary lines are really a collateral issue. Besides, the real questions involved require the taking of testimony which may more properly be taken and introduced in the trial courts.

Being of the opinion that the alternative writ in this proceeding was inadvertently issued, it is hereby ordered that the same be, and it is hereby dismissed.


Summaries of

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY v. DODD

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Apr 10, 1933
131 Cal.App. 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY v. DODD

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF CRESCENT CITY (a Municipal Corporation), Petitioner, v. G…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 1933

Citations

131 Cal.App. 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
21 P.2d 140

Citing Cases

County of Alpine v. County of Tuolumne

1921, chap. 838, p. 1607) which contained almost identical language. In City ofCrescent City v. Dodd (1933),…

Residents of the West Side v. City of Detroit

Several jurisdictions have held that this doctrine does not apply to municipal boundary disputes wherein the…