From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 9, 2001
534 U.S. 952 (2001)

Summary

holding that defendant violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act where its "agreements, including the non-exclusive ones, severely restricted Netscape's access to those distribution channels leading most efficiently to the acquisition of browser usage share" even though a substantial market-wide foreclosure share was not calculated

Summary of this case from NATCHITOCHES PAR. HOSP. SVC DIST. v. TYCO INT., LTD.

Opinion

OCTOBER 9, 2001


No. 01-207 RICHARD v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-210 BRUFF v. NORTH MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 495.

No. 01-214 CENTRAL TEXAS NUDISTS ET AL. v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL. Ct. App. Tex., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-215 DIXON ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO. ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 F.3d 1356.

No. 01-221 GAINES v. WHITE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIP ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Fed. Appx. 345.

No. 01-224 MENTAVLOS v. ANDERSON ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 249 F.3d 301.

No. 01-225 BOCZAR ET VIR v. KINGEN ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Fed. Appx. 471.

No. 01-231 SANDERS v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 768 A.2d 893.

No. 01-232 WOOLDRIDGE v. HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES. Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-236 MICROSOFT CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 34.

No. 01-239 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLC, ET AL. v. APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 245 F.3d 601.

No. 01-243 BARTOLETTI v. JANICICH ET AL. Sup.Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 305 Mont. 533.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 9, 2001
534 U.S. 952 (2001)

holding that defendant violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act where its "agreements, including the non-exclusive ones, severely restricted Netscape's access to those distribution channels leading most efficiently to the acquisition of browser usage share" even though a substantial market-wide foreclosure share was not calculated

Summary of this case from NATCHITOCHES PAR. HOSP. SVC DIST. v. TYCO INT., LTD.

finding that Microsoft engaged in anticompetitive behavior, albeit under § 2, when it inter alia threatened to stop distributing Intel products bundled with Windows products unless Intel stopped aiding other firms (Sun and Netscape) from developing Java technology that would threaten Microsoft's monopoly in operating system market

Summary of this case from Lucasys Inc. v. PowerPlan, Inc.

addressing market definition for dangerous probability of success element first

Summary of this case from In re Pool Prods. Distribution Mkt. Antitrust Litig.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 9, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 952 (2001)

Citing Cases

Vaughn v. Waffle House, Inc.

(1) that he has a bona fide religious belief that conflicts with an employment requirement; (2) that he…

Telfair v. Fed. Express Corp.

It is sufficient, for example, that the employer offer to help the employee apply for other positions where…