From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 6, 2000
531 U.S. 980 (2000)

Summary

holding that the defendant had no possessory interest in the vehicle itself or the items seized from it and therefore had no standing to challenge the search

Summary of this case from Stone v. State

Opinion

NOVEMBER 6, 2000


00-396 FLORIDA v. NIXON. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 758 So.2d 618.

00-399 NELSON v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-401 865 CENTENNIAL AVENUE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 648.

00-403 DI TULLIO v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF PUUONE TERRACE. Sup.Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 99 Haw. 223, 998 P.2d 1114.

00-416 HAEGER v. EDMOND ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 198 F.3d 263.

00-464 GEE v. 3900 CORP. ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1351.

00-521 PLEAS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-548 KARARA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 1358.

00-557 WILLIAMS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1323.

00-5168 HUGHES v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 24 S.W.3d 833.

00-5171 GREGG v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 754 A.2d 265.

00-5195 RAMON-SALDIVAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 638.

00-5199 RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 637.

00-5333 HAYES v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 21 Cal.4th 1211, 989 P.2d 645.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 6, 2000
531 U.S. 980 (2000)

holding that the defendant had no possessory interest in the vehicle itself or the items seized from it and therefore had no standing to challenge the search

Summary of this case from Stone v. State

applying rule of appellate procedure 44.2(b) harm analysis to argument that the State deprived appellant of qualified trial counsel by failing to comply with the procedure in code of criminal procedure article 26.052

Summary of this case from Fagan v. State
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 980 (2000)

Citing Cases

United States v. Chambers

"[I]n determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property, the basis of the property,…

Tran v. State

Article 37.071, which sets out the punishment-phase procedures after conviction of capital murder, "contains…