From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 943 (2001)

Summary

ruling is contrary to established federal law when state court applies law contradicting Supreme Court precedent

Summary of this case from Peay v. Warden

Opinion

MARCH 26, 2001


No. 00-1248. LURIE v. WITTNER ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 113.

No. 00-1253. BOONE ET AL. v. FISHER ET AL. Ct. App. Tex., 13th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1265. MORETTI v. UNITED WATER RESOURCES, INC., ET AL. Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1289. MACKEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 773.

No. 00-1292. BARRETT v. BOROUGH OF CARLISLE. Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 785 A.2d 774.

No. 00-1299. HENLEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 M.J. 488.

No. 00-1303. PAGAN v. UNITED STATES;

No. 00-8539. GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES; and

No. 00-8665. FELICIANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 223 F.3d 102.

No. 00-1308. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL. v. REIMER EXPRESS WORLD CORP. ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 934.

No. 00-1320. STANTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Ct. App. D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 757 A.2d 87.

No. 00-1352. KENNEDY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 240 F.3d 1078.

No. 00-1354. STEIN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 6.

No. 00-6619. DEAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 820.

No. 00-6949. ALVAREZ-MELGOZA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 417.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 943 (2001)

ruling is contrary to established federal law when state court applies law contradicting Supreme Court precedent

Summary of this case from Peay v. Warden

ruling is contrary to established federal law when state court applies law contradicting Supreme Court precedent

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. Lantz

affirming convictions of respondent and codefendants

Summary of this case from In Re. Otis

noting that the Fifth Amendment privilege applies in any proceeding where answers given might tend to incriminate the witness in a future criminal proceeding

Summary of this case from Britton v. Britton
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 26, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 943 (2001)

Citing Cases

Morales v. Artus

Yung v. Walker, 341 F.3d at 110; accord,e.g., DelValle v. Armstrong, 306 F.3d at 1200. Accord, e.g., Henry v.…

Pilar v. Phillips

"Yung v. Walker, 296 F.3d at 135; accord, e.g., DelValle v. Armstrong, 306 F.3d at 1200. Accord, e.g., Parsad…