From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 2008
Civil Action No. 06 - 1578 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06 — 1578.

March 17, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On November 27, 2006, the above captioned case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 28), filed on February 19, 2008, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants (doc. no. 18) be granted. All parties were served with the Report and Recommendation; no objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants (doc. no. 18) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 28) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated February 19, 2008, is adopted as the Opinion of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendants and the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 2008
Civil Action No. 06 - 1578 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Carey v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:DUWAYNE CAREY, Plaintiff, v. BARRY JOHNSON; LT. BIRKHIMER; and ELEANOR…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 17, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06 - 1578 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Pa. Dep't of Corr.

Although he cites several exhibits demonstrating that Defendants were generally aware of his request for a…

Williams v. Nyberg

], without any substantiating proof of an unlawful agreement,” are “insufficient to state a conspiracy…