From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-18

In the Matter of Donald CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Donald Campbell, Albion, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Donald Campbell, Albion, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Zwack, J.), entered February 14, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, filed a grievance alleging that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision unfairly treats inmates with driving while intoxicated convictions differently than other inmates seeking to participate in temporary release programs. His grievance was ultimately denied by the Central Office Review Committee. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging that denial and Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

This Court has been informed by the Attorney General that, since this appeal has been taken, petitioner has withdrawn his name from consideration for the work release program and, in any event, would have been eligible for such consideration because he is now within nine months of his reappearance date. “Inasmuch as petitioner is no longer aggrieved by the administrative action that was the subject of his grievance, his appeal must be dismissed as moot” ( Matter of Patel v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 84 A.D.3d 1668, 1669, 923 N.Y.S.2d 373 [2011] [citations omitted] ). Consequently, to the extent that petitioner raised a constitutional challenge, it cannot be addressed given the absence of a justiciable controversy ( see Matter of Justice v. Fischer, 74 A.D.3d 1648, 1649, 903 N.Y.S.2d 791 [2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 710, 2010 WL 4008458 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Campbell v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Donald CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 1222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
963 N.Y.S.2d 459
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2614

Citing Cases

Tafari v. Collyer

The record establishes that, during the pendency of the proceeding, petitioner was transferred to another…

Rizzuto v. Annucci

During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was released to parole supervision on January 26, 2022.…