From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vinod Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510977.

May 26, 2011.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered September 22, 2010 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

Vinod Patel, Coxsackie, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ.


Petitioner, an inmate at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County, filed a grievance alleging that the facility failed to secure an authority in the Hindu religion to assist him with practicing his faith. His grievance was ultimately denied by the Central Office Review Committee on the ground that the facility chaplain made several efforts to contact the local temple for advice on Hindu matters and had received no reply. After petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner now appeals.

This Court has been informed by the Attorney General that, since this appeal has been taken, the facility has secured a volunteer from the local Hindu temple to develop and offer spiritual services to inmates at Coxsackie Correctional Facility. Inasmuch as petitioner is no longer aggrieved by the administrative action that was the subject of his grievance, his appeal must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Abreu v Bellamy, 81 AD3d 1004; Matter of Tafari v Fischer, 76 AD3d 1149). However, petitioner is not foreclosed from filing a new grievance if spiritual services are not provided within a reasonable time.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32636(U).]


Summaries of

In re Vinod Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Vinod Patel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VINOD PATEL, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 1668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4342
923 N.Y.S.2d 373

Citing Cases

Tafari v. Collyer

The record establishes that, during the pendency of the proceeding, petitioner was transferred to another…

People v. Vasquez

We note at the outset that the Attorney General has advised this Court that, after petitioner commenced this…