From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 12, 2014
163 So. 3d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 3D12–271.

11-12-2014

Tony BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pearce v. State, 880 So.2d 561, 571 (Fla.2004) (stating that a trial court should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless there is no legally sustainable view of the evidence which the jury might find favorable to the opposing party); E.B. v. State, 531 So.2d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (holding that evidence offered to show its effect on one's state of mind, rather than for the truth of the matter it asserts, is not hearsay).

Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 12, 2014
163 So. 3d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tony BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

163 So. 3d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)