holding defendants waived challenge, including due process complaint, to lack of notice of default judgment hearing by failing to urge the issue in a motion for new trial
Summary of this case from Metro a v. PolleyNo. 90-1680.
June 17, 1991, October TERM, 1990.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 922 F. 2d 1097.
holding defendants waived challenge, including due process complaint, to lack of notice of default judgment hearing by failing to urge the issue in a motion for new trial
Summary of this case from Metro a v. Polleyholding that the appellant waived his claim that he was denied prior notice of the hearing on a motion for default judgment because the issue was not first presented to the trial court
Summary of this case from Karagounis v. Prop. Co. of Amerfinding it "illogical and contrary to the interests of judicial economy" that this court could not directly hold that "a constitutional right allegedly violated could not have been clearly established because it has not been recognized"
Summary of this case from Carswell v. Borough of Homesteadfinding that employee discharced two weeks prior to notified date of discharge but paid for full four weeks did not state an adverse employment action for ADEA claim
Summary of this case from Laforge v. Howarddeciding that the New Jersey Domestic Violence Act could not be construed as creating "either a quasi-custodial relationship" or "any concomitant Constitutional duty"
Summary of this case from Hartman v. Bachertaffirming issuance of injunction by district court even after notice of appeal was filed because "[t]he injunction expressly provided that it was issued to preserve the status quo [pending the appeal]"
Summary of this case from Death Row Prisoners v. Ridgestating that both Supreme Court precedent and "[t]he plain language of section 1983 . . . solely supports causes of action based upon violations, under the color of state law, of federal statutory law or constitutional rights. Section 1983 does not provide a cause of action for violations of state statutes, and, . . . a state statute cannot, in and of itself, create a constitutional right."
Summary of this case from SHAY v. COUNTY OF BERKSnoting that Anderson requires a court to analyze specific official actions of individual claiming qualified immunity
Summary of this case from Rouse v. PlantierFull title:BROWN, ADMINISTRATRIX AND ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 17, 1991
this court since has clarified that such a determination should be based on the undisputed facts as revealed…
Hurley-Bardige v. BrownThe Rehabilitation Act, he says, was only intended to cover "ultimate employment decisions such as hiring,…