From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Campion

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 23, 2000
757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

holding order denying indigency status is not immediately reviewable

Summary of this case from Washington v. McDonough

Opinion

No. 1D99-2969.

Opinion filed March 23, 2000. Rehearing denied April 27, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Donald R. Moran, Jr., Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.


Appellant has sought review of an order denying his Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis in a civil proceeding. The court previously converted the appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari. However, upon further consideration, it appears that such treatment is not appropriate.

The Fourth District has held that an appeal of an order denying a plaintiff's request to proceed as indigent in a civil case is properly treated as a petition for writ of certiorari.See Eberhardt v. Eberhardt, 590 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The court determined that such an order satisfies the standard for certiorari. See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (holding that certiorari is available where the order from which review is sought is a departure from the essential requirements of the law and will cause irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal). In Eberhardt, the court found specifically that if the plaintiff is indeed indigent, such an order is a departure from the essential requirements of the law, and that irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal will result because, not only will the plaintiff's indigency prevent him from proceeding to trial, it will prevent him from seeking redress on appeal as well.

However, we find that because a plaintiff who is denied indigency status at the trial level has a second opportunity to seek indigency status for appellate purposes, it cannot be presumed that he will be unable to seek redress on appeal. Thus, an order denying a plaintiff's request to proceed as indigent in a civil case does not result in irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal and is therefore not reviewable by a writ of certiorari. Furthermore, an order denying a plaintiff's request to proceed as indigent in a civil case is not a final order or a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.

For these reasons, the petition for writ of certiorari is hereby converted back to an appeal and is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to appellant to file a notice of appeal when a final order of dismissal is rendered.

BARFIELD, C.J., LAWRENCE, AND BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Brown v. Campion

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 23, 2000
757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

holding order denying indigency status is not immediately reviewable

Summary of this case from Washington v. McDonough

holding order denying indigency status is not immediately reviewable

Summary of this case from Swinson v. McDonough

holding order denying indigency status is not immediately reviewable

Summary of this case from Strickland v. McDonough

holding order denying indigency status is not immediately reviewable

Summary of this case from Ressler v. McDonough

holding that the denial of a request to proceed as an indigent does not result in irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal and is therefore not reviewable by a writ of certiorari, nor is the order a final order or an appealable, nonfinal order

Summary of this case from Conley v. State

converting certiorari petition back to an appeal and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction because an order denying a request for indigent status in a civil case is not appealable, either as a final order or as a non-final order listed in Fla. R. App. P. 9.130

Summary of this case from Knight v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

stating that order denying leave to proceed as an indigent is not reviewable by certiorari because an adequate remedy exists by final review of any final order in the circuit court proceedings

Summary of this case from O'Connor v. Santa Rosa Corr. Inst.

dismissing appeal of order denying request to proceed as indigent and holding that order is not reviewable by petition for writ of certiorari

Summary of this case from Hitchcock v. Hitchcock

In Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), that court concluded that the requirements for certiorari were not met and dismissed the appeal without prejudice to appellant's filing a notice of appeal after obtaining a final order of dismissal.

Summary of this case from Knod v. Moore
Case details for

Brown v. Campion

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE BROWN, JR., Appellant, v. DALE CAMPION AND EVANDER COLLIER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 23, 2000

Citations

757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

SABA v. BUSH

It is unlikely that this court would have found it had jurisdiction to review the circuit court's order by…

White v. Crosby

DENIED. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ.,…