From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brookins v. Cuiffi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2012
Civil No. 11-784 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-784

04-13-2012

EUGENE BROOKINS Plaintff, v. DANIEL CUIFFI and BOROUGH of WILKINSBURG, Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13 day of April, 2012, after the plaintiff filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss was submitted by defendants Daniel Cuiffi and Borough of Wilkinsburg, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties fourteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by defendants and the response to those objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 25), which is adopted as amended below, as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to count one of the complaint, the component of the intentional infliction of emotion distress claim related to Brookins's arrest and seizure, and as to all claims against Wilkinsburg.

The motion is DENIED as to Cuiffi's liability for malicious prosecution (count two), for intentional infliction of emotional distress resulting from malicious prosecution (count three), for entitlement to qualified immunity and for the claim for punitive damages in Cuiffi's individual capacity.

__________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brookins v. Cuiffi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 13, 2012
Civil No. 11-784 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Brookins v. Cuiffi

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE BROOKINS Plaintff, v. DANIEL CUIFFI and BOROUGH of WILKINSBURG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-784 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rivera-Guadalupe v. Pierce

nce of any other facts to support Rivera-Guadalupe's possession of a firearm-a jury could reasonably find…