From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

In Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp., 269 AD2d 483 (2nd Dept. 2000), the Second Department, again after a trial, dismissed a claim against the owner of a pumping station.

Summary of this case from Giannelis v. BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc.

Opinion

Argued January 14, 2000

February 24, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 2, 1999, which, upon the granting of the respondents' motion for judgment as a matter of law, made at the close of the evidence, dismissed the complaint.

Finkin Finkin Ferraro, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Warren S. Hecht of counsel), for appellants.

Torino Bernstein, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Bruce Torino and Christine M. Capitolo of counsel), for respondents.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Joseph Bonsera (hereinafter the plaintiff) was hit by a truck while in a refuse transfer station in Glen Cove. Before the trial began, the plaintiff settled the case against the defendant truck driver and his corporation for $90,000. At the close of the liability phase of the trial, the remaining defendants, who owned and operated the transfer station, moved for judgment as a matter of law. The trial court properly granted the motion on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove that the remaining defendants were negligent or that, if they were negligent, their negligence was a substantial cause of the accident.

Where, as here, there is no causal connection between the design and maintenance of the premises and the plaintiff's injuries, there is no liability against the remaining defendants (see,Margolin v. Friedman, 43 N.Y.2d 982 ; Weber v. Keller, 24 A.D.2d 618, affd 17 N.Y.2d 790 ). The record reveals that the accident happened as a result of the truck driver's failure to control his vehicle and that the premises "merely furnished the condition or occasion for the occurrence of the event rather than one of its causes" (Sheehan v. City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 496, 503 ).


Summaries of

Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

In Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp., 269 AD2d 483 (2nd Dept. 2000), the Second Department, again after a trial, dismissed a claim against the owner of a pumping station.

Summary of this case from Giannelis v. BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc.
Case details for

Bonsera v. Universal Recycling Services Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BONSERA, et al., appellants, v. UNIVERSAL RECYCLING SERVICES CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

Portelli v. Garcia

A plaintiff's intervening conduct or that of a third party can break the chain of causal connection between a…

Long v. Cleary

"Speculation, guess and surmise may not be substituted for competent evidence" ( Price v. Hampson, supra, at…