From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Dominic

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2018
330 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

10-10-2018

Christopher BARKER v. ALL ROOFS BY DOMINIC et al.

Joseph J. Passaretti, Jr., Glastonbury, in support of the petition. Joy L. Avallone, assistant attorney general, Hartford, in opposition.


The petition by the defendants the city of Bridgeport and PMA Insurance Company for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 183 Conn.App. 612, 193 A.3d 693 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under General Statutes § 31-291, as construed by Massolini v. Driscoll, 114 Conn. 546, 159 A. 480 (1932), the defendant city of Bridgeport was liable for workers' compensation benefits as the principal employer of a worker hired by an uninsured subcontractor to repair the roof of a building owned by the city?"

D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Barker v. Dominic

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2018
330 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

Barker v. Dominic

Case Details

Full title:Christopher BARKER v. ALL ROOFS BY DOMINIC et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 10, 2018

Citations

330 Conn. 925 (Conn. 2018)
194 A.3d 292

Citing Cases

Barker v. Dominic

We granted the defendants' petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…