holding appellate counsel inadequate when counsel raised only sufficiency of evidence claim in five-page appellate brief
Summary of this case from Spisak v. CoyleNo. 87-744.
January 11, 1988, OCTOBER TERM, 1987.
January 11, 1988.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 822 F. 2d 1348.
C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 261 U. S. App. D.C. 322, 821 F. 2d 810.
holding appellate counsel inadequate when counsel raised only sufficiency of evidence claim in five-page appellate brief
Summary of this case from Spisak v. Coyledistinguishing "damages" from claims for injunctive or restitutionary relief, and stating that "damages" are `payments to third persons when those persons have a legal claim for damages.'"
Summary of this case from H.L. Libby Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companyfiling cursory five-page brief on appeal
Summary of this case from Hurrell-Harring v. Stateapplying Massachusetts law
Summary of this case from Fernanders v. Marks Const. of S.C., Inc.Full title:ARMCO INC. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 11, 1988
Our first determination concerns whether a conflict of laws in fact exists. Eli Lilly Co., 764 F.2d at 882…
Minnesota Min. Mfg. v. Travelers IndemSee, e.g., Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Milliken Co., 857 F.2d 979, 981 (4th Cir. 1988) (applying South Carolina…