From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

U.S.
May 12, 2008
553 U.S. 1028 (2008)

Summary

affirming under 28 U.S.C. § 2109

Summary of this case from In re South African Apartheid Litigation

Opinion

No. 07–919.

2008-05-12

AMERICAN ISUZU MOTORS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Lungisile NTSEBEZA, et al.


Case below, 504 F.3d 254.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U.S.C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U.S.C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice KENNEDY, Justice BREYER, and Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


Summaries of

Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

U.S.
May 12, 2008
553 U.S. 1028 (2008)

affirming under 28 U.S.C. § 2109

Summary of this case from In re South African Apartheid Litigation

requiring that an aiding-and-abetting defendant “substantially assist the principal violation”

Summary of this case from Wultz v. Bank of China Limited
Case details for

Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. Ntsebeza

Case Details

Full title:AM. ISUZU MOTORS, INC., ET AL. v. LUNGISILE NTSEBEZA ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

553 U.S. 1028 (2008)
128 S. Ct. 2424
171 L. Ed. 2d 225
76 U.S.L.W. 3405

Citing Cases

Balintulo v. Daimler AG

After the defendants sought a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court affirmed our decision for want of a…

Wultz v. Bank of China Limited

Alternately, if the Court were to compare the elements of common-law aiding and abetting with CWO § 12, it…