From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acevedo v. City of New York Dept. of Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 16, 1996
227 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 16, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.).


That defendant Department of Transportation failed to bring to plaintiff's attention, after plaintiff served a notice of claim upon it, that the notice was improperly served, does not give rise to an estoppel claim ( Kroin v. City of New York, 210 A.D.2d 95). We have considered plaintiff's other contention and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Acevedo v. City of New York Dept. of Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 16, 1996
227 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Acevedo v. City of New York Dept. of Transp

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ACEVEDO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 16, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 291

Citing Cases

Silicato v. Skanska USA Civil Northeast Inc.

de § 7–201 [a]; CPLR 311[a][2] ), and, as a rule, the Corporation Counsel is the “attorney and counsel for…

Lavalliere v. D.O.C. of N.Y

The action was properly dismissed since the notice of claim was served more than 90 days after the accident…