From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Accent Associates v. Wheatley Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

holding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim for a breach of a joint venture agreement where it “failed to allege ... responsibility for losses”

Summary of this case from Northeast Industrial Development Corp. v. ParkStone Capital Partners, LLC (In re Northeast Industrial Development Corp.)

Opinion

Argued December 13, 1999

January 24, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered November 23, 1998, as granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Shaw, Licitra, Bohner, Esernio Schwartz, P.C., Garden City, N Y (J. Stanley Shaw of counsel), for appellant.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom, LLP, New York, N Y (Marco E. Schnabl and William J. Hine of counsel), for respondents.

DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff did not state a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract because it failed to allege that it was a licensed real estate broker (see, Real Property Law § 440[1], 442-d; Levinson v. Genesse Assocs., 172 A.D.2d 400 ; Gartrell v. Jennings, 283 App. Div. 879 ). The causes of action to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty must fail because the plaintiff failed to allege the elements of a joint venture: that is, it shared control of the project or responsibility for losses (see, Matter of Steinbeck v. Gerosa, 4 N.Y.2d 302, 317 ; Tilden of N.J. v. Regency Leasing Sys., Inc., 230 A.D.2d 784 ; Mendelson v. Feinman, 143 A.D.2d 76 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.

JOY, J.P., ALTMAN, GOLDSTEIN, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Accent Associates v. Wheatley Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 2000
268 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

holding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim for a breach of a joint venture agreement where it “failed to allege ... responsibility for losses”

Summary of this case from Northeast Industrial Development Corp. v. ParkStone Capital Partners, LLC (In re Northeast Industrial Development Corp.)
Case details for

Accent Associates v. Wheatley Construction

Case Details

Full title:ACCENT ASSOCIATES, INC., appellant, v. WHEATLEY CONSTRUCTION CORP., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 24, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

SEA CARRIERS CORPORATION v. EMPIRE PROGRAMS INC

See Am. Compl. ¶ 38 ("As a result of the parties' Joint Venture agreement, and their relationship as…

Schnur v. Marin

The plaintiff and the defendants (hereinafter collectively the purported joint venturers) never agreed to the…