Dorothy M. Harding, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 22, 1998
01981008 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 22, 1998)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Amoss v. Broadbent

    It would appear that the verdict as to compensatory damages is supported by the evidence and we see no basis…

1 Citing case

01981008

12-22-1998

Dorothy M. Harding, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Dorothy M. Harding v. United States Postal Service

01981008

December 22, 1998

Dorothy M. Harding, )

Appellant, ) Appeal No. 01981008

) Agency No. 1-G-781-0072-97

v. )

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

INTRODUCTION

Appellant timely filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (Commission) from the final decision of the agency concerning

her complaint of discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation Act

of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C �791 et seq. The appeal is accepted by the

Commission in accordance with the provisions of EEOC Order No. 960.001.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed appellant's

complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

BACKGROUND

Appellant initiated EEO counseling on June 18, 1997, and thereafter filed

a complaint on September 9, 1997, in which she alleged discrimination

based on physical disability (deaf/hard of hearing) when: (1) on

March 3, 1997, she was not provided with an interpreter when filing

an OWCP Form CA-2A and did not have her options explained to her; (2)

she was left out of safety meetings; and (3) there are no TTY machines

accessible in her facility. In a final decision dated October 30, 1997,

the agency failed to identify when the safety meetings occurred nor did

they show when appellant was denied access to TTY machines. The decision

dismissed all the issues for untimely EEO Counselor contact, noting that,

while issue (1) occurred on March 3, 1997, appellant did not initiate

counseling until June 19, 1997.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Initially, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed

Issue 1. In so finding, we note that appellant did not contact the

EEO Counselor until 107 days after the occurrence of Issue 1. Because

that was well beyond the 45-day period for such contact set forth at

29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1), we agree that the contact was untimely.

As discussed, however, the agency failed to identify dates for Issues

2 and 3 in its final decision. We find that the agency erred when it

dismissed appellant's complaint without providing evidence to support

dismissal of Issues (2) and (3)<1>, and that the agency wrongfully

dismissed them without explanation. Accordingly, the Commission reverses

the dismissal of Issues 2 and 3 and remands them for processing.

CONCLUSION

The agency's decision to dismiss Issue 1 is AFFIRMED. The decision

to dismiss Issues 2 and 3 is REVERSED and those issues are REMANDED to

the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and

applicable regulations.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process Issues 2 and 3 in accordance with 29

C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant that

it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right to

file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See

29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action" 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See

29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

this decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you

receive a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any

argument in opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to

reconsider MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request to

reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments must bear

proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received by the

Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0993)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. It is the position of the Commission that you have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date you receive this

decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions

have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL

TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in

court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not

the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

DEC 22, 1998

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal,Director

Office of Federal Operations

1 To the extent appellant is alleging an ongoing policy of not making

available a TTY machine at her facility, the agency shall consider this

allegation timely railed.